[Rude Pundit is still on vacation. @presbyhippy Andrew William Smith still filling in.]
I was a teenage pacifist. Weaned on Martin Luther King and John Lennon, I don’t remember not knowing the words to “We Shall Overcome” or “Give Peace A Chance.” If we’re holding hands, I cannot use my hands to hit you. If we’re singing together, I am not shouting at you.
I was a teenage pacifist. There might have been a
brief time around 12-years-old when I thought perhaps I could give violence a
try. A friend and I disagreed about the interpretation of a book (sick literary
nerd that I am), so I suggested we settle the disagreement with a duel. Dumb
idea. He was much bigger than me. One hit, I was down. That’s just to say my
pacifism always had a practical side, not wanting to get my butt kicked, but
this did not stop me from thoroughly developing my inner hippy, all about love
and peace.
Pacifists in North America have some privilege,
insofar as the police and the military like to suggest they are protecting your
right to be pacifist. That changes when you engage in a direct-action campaign
against atrocities being planned or carried out by your government. In the
process of nonviolent civil disobedience as taught to us by the likes of
Thoreau, Gandhi, and King, pacifists can lose their privileges. We go to jail,
which is a rite of passage for pacifists. We need to be willing to do hard time
or die to defend our right not to kill, otherwise we might not really be
pacifists. As a teen and 20-something, I tried just that and managed to do a
little jail time and leave that period of my direct action career without a
criminal record.
As a middle-aged activist with a career and
responsibilities I did not have when I was trespassing on military sites, I tend
to prefer prayer as a form of direct action, and this modifies my pacifism. I
would allow the police to defend me in a crisis, but I also know the police may
arrest me or kill me. Idealism tends to get renegotiated as your hair turns
gray.
Today, I feel powerless to stop the horrible
atrocities in several hot spots of the middle East, so I pray for peace. This
approach gets bad press from more militant activists, yet to out-of-hand bash
the whole singing and holding hands bit has become a cliché all its own! I know
this blog has a dark humorous streak on most days, but it’s sometimes okay to
just balk on the bitter part and say enough with the snark and irony and cynicism
already. Maybe we really need to hold hands and sing "Kumbaya"?
Even in the passionately optimistic book Love Wins (to which I referred yesterday), the Christian author Rob Bell makes a snide aside about salvation not really being “a universal hugfest where everybody eventually ends up around the heavenly campfire singing ‘Kumbaya,’ with Jesus playing guitar.”
I’ve always thought that thees cynical remarks about a spiritual-woowoo-hippie-peacenik utopia where we-all-hold-hands-and-sing-“Kumbaya” should not be used so dismissively when others sincerely set out to achieve a cosmic vision of unlimited grace, pure peace, and perfect love.
Even in the passionately optimistic book Love Wins (to which I referred yesterday), the Christian author Rob Bell makes a snide aside about salvation not really being “a universal hugfest where everybody eventually ends up around the heavenly campfire singing ‘Kumbaya,’ with Jesus playing guitar.”
I’ve always thought that thees cynical remarks about a spiritual-woowoo-hippie-peacenik utopia where we-all-hold-hands-and-sing-“Kumbaya” should not be used so dismissively when others sincerely set out to achieve a cosmic vision of unlimited grace, pure peace, and perfect love.
As cheesy, easy, or breezy as some might say it
sounds, this wonderful and scandalous and radical message of love locates at
the core of the canon. Standing in a circle, holding hands, and singing
“Kumbaya” may not instantly usher in world peace or even the kingdom on earth as
it is in heaven, but I maintain that it would be a good place to start.
I am not a middle-aged pacifist with the convictions
of a teenage pacifist. I am a middle-aged peacenik who accepts moral compromise daily. I can think of some situations where self-defense makes
sense or where I would allow those so professionally-trained to use force on my
behalf. But I am also aware that the guns could be turned against me. I still
don’t own a gun, still see flight as better than fight. Love and light are
still the most radically disarming forces I can imagine as operative in the universe,
and their practical application has yet to be fully tried.
You may not want to sing “Give Peace A Chance,” “We
Shall Overcome,” or “Kumbaya.” Such actions may not stop the bombs and
brutality in Gaza or dismantle the prison industrial complex or stop institutional
racism or end mountaintop removal or guarantee civil rights for LGBTQ friends
or provide access to birth control and abortion services for women. You may
have had enough of praying for “peace” in a world that preaches it often and
practices it rarely. I get that.
Yet somewhere, someone has ended a conflict with
forgiveness or made friends with an enemy and somewhere, someone is better for
it.
I
cannot believe the Rude Pundit asked me to pen these blogs for the last three
days, but I have thoroughly enjoyed it. Peaceout!